Call (916) 277-8299 Free case evaluation

Practices  /  Domestic Violence

Domestic violence defense in California.

The person who called cannot end the case. That decision belongs to the district attorney, and it is made without them. Licensed since 1999.

Who actually controls the case.

The most common misunderstanding in this area is about who is in charge. People believe that if the person who called withdraws the complaint, the case ends. It does not. The prosecution belongs to the district attorney, who can and routinely does proceed without the complainant's cooperation, using the recorded call, the photographs, the body camera footage and what was said at the scene.

That has a practical consequence people learn too late. A great many of these cases arise from a single argument that escalated, in a relationship that continues afterwards. Both parties then try to fix it between themselves, and every attempt to do so becomes evidence. Calls from custody are recorded and reviewed. Messages are produced. Contact in breach of a protective order is a separate offence regardless of who initiated it.

Charges here also cover a wider range of relationships than most people expect. Penal Code 273.5 applies to spouses, former spouses, cohabitants, former cohabitants, people in a dating relationship and the other parent of a child. The section was amended in 2024.

Domestic violence charges I defend.

These are the domestic violence and related charges I defend across California.

Common domestic violence charges

  • Domestic battery (Penal Code 243(e)(1)). A misdemeanour requiring no visible injury at all. Any unlawful touching is sufficient. Amended in 2024.
  • Corporal injury on a spouse or partner (Penal Code 273.5). Requires a traumatic condition, which can be minor. A wobbler, and the principal charge in this area. Amended in 2024.
  • Violating a protective order (Penal Code 273.6). A separate offence, committed by contact even where the protected person initiated it.
  • Child endangerment (Penal Code 273a). Added where children were present, whether or not they were involved.
  • Damaging a telephone line (Penal Code 591). Charged where a phone was taken or damaged during an argument, which happens more often than the section's title suggests.

Serious and felony charges

  • Criminal threats (Penal Code 422). Words alone can support it, and it is a strike when charged as a felony. Amended in 2025.
  • Stalking (Penal Code 646.9). Often charged from messages sent after a separation. Amended in 2024.
  • False imprisonment (Penal Code 236). Charged where someone was prevented from leaving a room, which is a low threshold.
  • Assault likely to produce great bodily injury (Penal Code 245(a)(4)). A strike offence, charged on the force alleged rather than the injury caused.
  • Elder or dependent adult abuse (Penal Code 368). Applies where the alleged victim is over 65 or a dependent adult. Amended in 2024.

Charges often filed alongside

A single incident commonly produces several counts, and the ones added afterwards are often the ones that cause the most difficulty.

  • Witness or victim intimidation (Penal Code 136.1). Very frequently added from recorded custody calls, and it is a strike in some forms. Amended in 2025.
  • Definition of domestic violence (Penal Code 13700). Determines which relationships bring a case within this framework at all.
  • Battery with serious bodily injury (Penal Code 243(d)). Charged where the injury is characterised as serious, which is contested regularly. Amended in 2024.

Orders, conditions and consequences

  • Mandatory probation conditions (Penal Code 1203.097). Sets the minimum terms on any domestic violence probation, including a 52-week batterer's programme. Amended in 2024.
  • Firearm prohibition (Penal Code 29805). A domestic violence misdemeanour carries a ten-year state prohibition and a separate lifetime federal one. Amended in 2024.
  • Record relief afterwards (Penal Code 1203.4). What is available once the case is over, and what a dismissal does not reach.

If a protective order has been issued, read it before doing anything else. It binds you regardless of what the other person wants, and violating it is the most common way a manageable case becomes a serious one.

What a conviction can cost.

A domestic violence conviction carries consequences that are unusually structured, because much of what follows is mandatory rather than discretionary.

  • The 52-week programme. A batterer's intervention programme is a mandatory condition of domestic violence probation under Penal Code 1203.097, and it runs for a year.
  • Firearm rights. A misdemeanour conviction carries a ten-year state prohibition and a lifetime federal one. The federal bar applies even where California law would eventually allow possession again.
  • Protective orders. A criminal protective order can restrict where you live and whether you can return home, and it is issued at the first appearance before anything is decided.
  • Custody and family court. Family court applies its own standard on its own timeline, and an allegation alone can affect custody before the criminal case is resolved.
  • Immigration. Domestic violence convictions are a specific ground of deportability, separate from the general categories.
  • Employment and licensing. Particularly consequential for anyone in law enforcement, security, healthcare or any role requiring a firearm.

Because the firearm and programme consequences attach to the conviction rather than to the sentence, what a charge resolves to matters more here than the sentence usually does.

Why these cases are rarely simple.

The complainant cannot end it, and trying makes it worse

The district attorney decides whether to proceed, and these cases are regularly prosecuted with an uncooperative complainant. Meanwhile every attempt by the parties to resolve it privately produces evidence: recorded calls, messages, and potential charges for intimidation or breaching an order.

One side calls, and the other becomes the defendant

Officers responding to a domestic call are generally required to identify a primary aggressor and make an arrest. That decision is made quickly, on limited information, and frequently in a situation where both people have accounts. Being the one who did not call is often the whole of why someone is the defendant.

The first account is not the last word

Statements given at the scene are made by people who are upset, frightened or angry, sometimes intoxicated, and always without advice. Accounts change, and the reasons they change are examinable. So are the photographs, the injuries and whether they fit what was described.

What experience with these cases actually changes

It is knowing which counts tend to be added later, how the firearm consequences actually work in combination, when a resolution avoids the mandatory programme, and how a given county handles protective orders. I have been doing this since 1999.

Whether hiring an attorney is worth it depends on what is at stake beyond the sentence. Because the firearm prohibition, the 52-week programme and the family court consequences attach to the conviction itself, a first misdemeanour here carries more downstream weight than a first misdemeanour in most other areas. Where your work requires a firearm, where custody is in issue, or where immigration status is involved, it is worth advice. Call me and I will tell you honestly what you are facing and what representation would cost.

How I defend these cases.

  • Dealing with the protective order — first, because it governs where you can be and what contact is permitted while everything else is pending.
  • Investigation — the recorded call, the body camera footage, the photographs, the injuries and the accounts given before anyone had time to reflect.
  • Testing the case — whether the injury meets the section charged, whether self-defence applies, whether the primary aggressor determination holds up, and whether each added count is supported.
  • Negotiation — with the firearm consequence and the mandatory programme treated as the things that matter, not only the sentence.
  • Trial readiness — where the offer does not reflect what the file will support.
  • Personal attention — you work with us directly.

I have been licensed to practise in California since 1999, State Bar number 203402, and I defend these cases across nine Northern California counties from offices in Sacramento and Roseville. When you call, tell me whether a protective order has been issued and whether your work requires a firearm.

Where I handle these cases.

I appear in the criminal courts of all nine counties below. Protective order practice varies between them, and it is one of the areas where local practice genuinely affects the outcome.

Sacramento County Placer County Yolo County El Dorado County San Joaquin County Butte County Yuba County Solano County Sutter County

Where a city has enough demand for this charge to warrant its own page, I have written one:

Sacramento

Questions I hear most.

Can the alleged victim drop the charges?

No. The decision to prosecute belongs to the district attorney, not to the person who called. These cases are regularly pursued with an uncooperative complainant, using the recorded call, the body camera footage, the photographs and what was said at the scene. A withdrawal of cooperation is relevant, but it does not end the case.

What is the difference between Penal Code 243(e)(1) and 273.5?

Domestic battery under 243(e)(1) is a misdemeanour requiring no visible injury; any unlawful touching is enough. Corporal injury under 273.5 requires a traumatic condition, which can still be minor, and it is a wobbler that can be filed as a felony. Which one is charged is frequently the most consequential thing in the case — see Penal Code 273.5 in detail.

We have reconciled. Can we just talk to each other?

Not if a protective order has been issued. The order binds you regardless of what the protected person wants, and contact is a separate offence under Penal Code 273.6 even where they initiated it. Contact is also charged as witness intimidation under Penal Code 136.1. If circumstances have genuinely changed, the order can be addressed in court, which is the only safe route.

Will I lose my right to own a firearm?

A domestic violence misdemeanour conviction carries a ten-year prohibition under California law and a lifetime prohibition under federal law. The federal bar continues even after the state period ends. If your work requires a firearm this is usually the most important issue in the case — see weapons charges.

I was defending myself. Why was I the one arrested?

Officers responding to a domestic call are generally required to identify a primary aggressor, and that determination is made quickly with limited information. Self-defence is a complete defence in California, and where both parties have injuries or both have accounts, who was arrested at the scene is a poor guide to what actually happened.

Is the 52-week programme mandatory?

Where probation is granted on a domestic violence conviction, Penal Code 1203.097 makes a 52-week batterer's intervention programme a mandatory condition. It cannot be waived by agreement. That is one of the main reasons the count a case resolves to matters so much here.

What does defending a domestic violence case cost?

It depends on whether it is charged as a felony or a misdemeanour, whether a protective order is contested, and whether the case is likely to resolve or be tried. Call and I will tell you what representation in your situation would cost before you commit to anything.

Last updated

Real Client Testimonials

Five stars on Google.
Both offices.

Sacramento
The Law Offices of Christopher Parkhurst exceeded my expectations. Attorney Kit Parkhurst was extremely responsive and professional from the very beginning. I contacted his office on behalf of a family member, and he responded within seconds to offer a free consultation. Remarkably, he was able to resolve the case the very same day.
All communication was handled efficiently by phone and email, and we did not even need to appear in court. He later called to confirm that the case was resolved and all charges had been dropped.
Attorney Parkhurst is highly knowledgeable, professional, friendly, compassionate, and honest. His pricing was also very affordable. I highly recommend his services to anyone in need of legal representation.
Katy Nunez6 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Rob Ward and Aaron Weaver did an excellent job helping me with a driving-related case. From the beginning they were very responsive, professional, and made sure I understood every step of the process. Their experience and strategy made a huge difference and they were able to negotiate a significantly better outcome than what I was originally facing. I’m very grateful for their help and would highly recommend them!
Brandon Muela4 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Kit was amazing to work with. He really went above and beyond for our family and stayed on top of everything. He was super responsive, easy to talk to, and just genuinely kind. We felt supported the whole time and are really thankful we had him on our side.
Linzy Moore3 months ago · 10 reviews
Sacramento
I can’t recommend Kit enough. He is a true blessing. Professional, knowledgeable, and genuinely caring. He handled everything with confidence and kept us at ease the entire time. The results exceeded our expectations, and we’re very thankful for his dedication to our family.
Dominique Moore3 months ago · 2 reviews
Sacramento
On Saturday April 3, 2026 I was arrested for a domestic violence charge and given my first court appearance on April 7, 2026

Due to the weekend and Easter I was unable to get help from an attorney. When I called and found Kit on Monday April 6, 2026, he immediately picked up the phone and assured me I was in good hands and could help.

Kit could hear my stress level and told me several times everything would be fine. Kit then explained his plan of action and on April 7, 2026 at 1100 hours Kit called me stating he spoke to the DA and the charges would not be filed.

If it wasn't for Kit's approach, knowledge and claming personality not sure what my outcome would of been.

I hope no ever gets fasley arrested, but if you do, do not hesitate to call Kit and let him work for you.

Lastly I just want thank God for bringing this talented, non-judgemental Attorney into my life when I needed someone to help.
Mike3 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Showing love from Huntington Beach! Thank you Kit and Aaron! These guys got me out of a jam and I highly recommend! I didn’t have to drive hours to resolve! Thank you again Aaron!! Best of luck on all your cases!
nik saba month ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
If you want to work with an experienced attorney that has integrity, is honest, and genuinely cares about his clients look no further than Aaron and his wonderful team.

I couldn’t be more impressed with the outstanding service provided by my attorney. From the very first consultation, they were professional, attentive, and genuinely invested in my case. They took the time to explain every detail clearly, answered all of my questions, and guided me through each step with confidence and expertise.

Their communication was exceptional, offered consistent updates, quick responses, and a reassuring presence throughout the entire process. It was clear they truly cared about achieving the best possible outcome, and their hard work absolutely paid off.

Thanks to their dedication and skill, what could have been a stressful situation was handled smoothly and efficiently. I highly recommend Aaron to anyone seeking knowledgeable, trustworthy, and compassionate legal representation.
Ashley Sinhg8 months ago · 6 reviews · 1 photo
Sacramento
I found myself in a situation where I was facing charges.
The morning after Christmas I had arraignment and was petrified of what was about to happen.
I called several Law offices, Chris picked up and quickly gave me a huge feeling of relief.
He knew what was happening in the back scenes and explained how we should go about figuring it out.
He made one phone call and informed me my case was dropped.
I truly can't thank him enough!
What a great guy, I would recommend him to anyone.
I wanted to post on all channels, it's beyond real and deserved.

Seriously Chris you went out of your way to help me and I appreciate it so much! Ill never forget it.
Dan Bergendahl6 months ago · 15 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
If you’re looking for a lawyer that is hardworking, skilled, family oriented and exceeds all expectations you have come to the right place. Chris Parkhurst showed up for me and my family and kept us updated the whole way. He’s gone above and beyond for me and if you’re hoping to have the best possible outcome for you then I’d recommend them 100%.
Quinn Zidara year ago · 5 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
BEST LAW FIRM EVER!!!!!! I was so blessed they took my case and they were extremely helpful. I was dealt a bad hand and this law firm got my 3 counts dismissed. 1 second im probably going away for a long time and the next everything was dropped. I couldn't have asked for a better law firm and would recommend them to any in need of a fantastic law firm. Thank you for everything you've done for my family and I
Steven Marley5 years ago · 4 reviews
Roseville
Chris is amazing. I was looking at time in jail and this man got me off with probation. I owe him a lot. There isn’t enough I can say what he’s done for me and my family. I think him from the bottom of my heart. If u need a attorney this who I would recommend
Jeff Hill5 years ago · 1 review
Roseville
The law isn’t always on your side. As a veteran that can be frustrating and disheartening. Kit and the team really go to bat for you and I can’t thank them enough. If you find yourself needing legal representation put your trust in their hands to do everything they possibly can to help you cause they will. Thank you
Chico Moralesa year ago · 3 reviews

Read all of our reviews