Call (916) 277-8299 Free case evaluation

Practices  /  Sex Crimes

Sex crime defense in California.

These cases are frequently decided by what a charge is resolved to rather than by the sentence attached to it. Licensed since 1999.

What these charges actually require.

Sex offences in California cover a very wide range, from a misdemeanour that carries no registration at all through to charges carrying life exposure. What they have in common is that the consequence people fear most is usually not the sentence. It is the registration obligation under Penal Code 290, which attaches to the conviction and operates for years or for life depending on the tier.

That changes the shape of the defence. In most areas of criminal law the negotiation is about custody. Here, a resolution to a charge that does not require registration can matter more than a shorter sentence on one that does, and the two do not always move together.

The other feature of these cases is that they are frequently built without any physical evidence at all. What is being tested is an account: when it was first given, what was said then, how it has developed since, and what the surrounding messages and records actually show. That work is careful and slow, and it starts long before any court date.

Sex offence charges I defend.

These are the charges I defend across California. Whether a given offence carries a registration obligation, and at which tier, is one of the first things worth establishing.

Misdemeanour and wobbler offences

  • Indecent exposure (Penal Code 314). A misdemeanour on a first offence, but one that carries a registration obligation, which makes it far more serious than its sentence suggests.
  • Sexual battery (Penal Code 243.4). A wobbler covering touching for sexual purposes, with the felony form turning on restraint or incapacity. Amended in 2024.
  • Lewd conduct and solicitation (Penal Code 647). Misdemeanour offences in public places, most of which do not carry registration. Amended in 2024.
  • Unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (Penal Code 261.5). Charged on age alone. Consent is not a defence, and the age gap determines how it can be filed.
  • Contact with a minor for a sexual offence (Penal Code 288.3). Frequently charged from online communications and sting operations, where the intent element is the contested question.

Serious felony offences

  • Rape (Penal Code 261). Turns on the absence of consent and on the specific circumstance charged. Amended in 2024.
  • Sodomy (Penal Code 286). Charged under a range of circumstances, with the exposure varying enormously between them.
  • Oral copulation (Penal Code 287). Renumbered from the former section 288a, so older references and current ones do not match.
  • Forcible penetration (Penal Code 289). Carries exposure comparable to the most serious offences in this category.
  • Lewd acts with a child (Penal Code 288). Among the most serious charges in California law, with life exposure in some subsections.
  • Possession of child pornography (Penal Code 311.11). Frequently arises from a forensic examination of a device rather than from any complainant. Amended in 2024.

Registration and related obligations

Registration is not a sentence. It is a separate consequence attached to the conviction, and it is frequently the reason a case resolves the way it does.

  • Sex offender registration (Penal Code 290). The tiered obligation. Which tier applies is determined by the conviction, and it is the single most important thing in most of these cases. Amended in 2024.
  • Assault with intent to commit a felony (Penal Code 220). The intent element is what is charged, and it is proved by inference.
  • Record relief and relief from registration (Penal Code 1203.4). What is available after a case is over, and what is not.

Charges often filed alongside

  • False imprisonment (Penal Code 236). Commonly filed alongside where restraint is alleged.
  • Criminal threats (Penal Code 422). Added where messages sent afterwards are characterised as threatening. Amended in 2025.
  • Witness or victim intimidation (Penal Code 136.1). Charged where there has been contact with the complainant after the allegation, which is why that contact must stop immediately. Amended in 2025.
  • Domestic violence offences (Penal Code 273.5). Where the parties are in a listed relationship, both sets of charges often appear together.

If you have been contacted by an investigator but not arrested, that is the most useful moment to call. A great deal of what these cases are built from is gathered in exactly that period, and once it exists it cannot be removed.

Registration and what else it costs.

The sentence is often not the consequence that matters most here.

  • Registration. A tiered obligation under Penal Code 290, running for a minimum of ten or twenty years or for life depending on the conviction. It attaches to the conviction, not to the sentence.
  • Where you can live. Registration carries residence and reporting requirements that restrict housing in practical terms, quite apart from the law.
  • Custody. From no custody at all through to life terms, depending entirely on the count charged.
  • Your employment. Any role involving contact with children or vulnerable adults becomes closed, and professional licensing boards act independently of the court.
  • Immigration. Most offences in this category are aggravated felonies or crimes involving moral turpitude, with consequences that do not depend on the sentence.
  • Family court. An allegation alone can affect custody and visitation immediately, on a different standard and a faster timetable than the criminal case.

Establishing which of these actually applies to the count charged is the first useful piece of work, and it frequently changes what a good outcome looks like.

Why the early stage decides these cases.

What the resolution is called matters more than its length

Because registration attaches to particular convictions, a resolution to a non-registerable offence can be worth far more than a shorter sentence on a registerable one. That is not obvious from the outside, and it is the single biggest reason these cases need someone who works on them regularly.

Most of the evidence is created after the allegation

Pretext calls, text messages and social media exchanges obtained after a complaint is made are often the bulk of the file. They are also the part a person under investigation still has control over, right up until the moment they respond.

Accounts have a history worth examining

When an allegation was first made, to whom, in what words, and how it has changed since are all discoverable. So are the records around it. Careful reconstruction of that timeline is frequently the defence, and it is not work that can be done quickly at the courthouse.

What experience with these cases actually changes

It is knowing which offences carry which registration tier, which forensic evidence is genuinely contestable, and how these cases are actually negotiated rather than how they are described. I have been doing this since 1999.

There is no version of a sex offence charge that is sensible to face alone. The registration consequence is permanent in a way that a sentence is not, and it turns on distinctions between offences that are not visible without knowing them. What is worth discussing is what representation involves and what it costs. Call me and I will tell you both honestly.

How I defend these cases.

  • Immediate intervention — dealing with investigators directly, and stopping the contact that these cases are so often built from.
  • Establishing the registration question — which counts carry an obligation and at which tier, because that frames every decision that follows.
  • Testing the case — the timeline of the account, the surrounding records, the forensic examination of any device, and whether each element is actually supported.
  • Independent investigation — witnesses, messages and records that the prosecution has not gathered because it had no reason to look.
  • Negotiation — with the registration consequence treated as the thing that matters most, not the sentence.
  • Personal attention — you work with us directly, and these conversations stay privileged.

I have been licensed to practise in California since 1999, State Bar number 203402, and I defend these cases across nine Northern California counties from offices in Sacramento and Roseville. If you have been contacted but not arrested, that is the call to make first.

Where I handle these cases.

I appear in the criminal courts of all nine counties below. The court that hears your case is set by where the alleged offence occurred.

Sacramento County Placer County Yolo County El Dorado County San Joaquin County Butte County Yuba County Solano County Sutter County

Where a city has enough demand for this charge to warrant its own page, I have written one:

Sacramento

Questions I hear most.

Does every sex offence conviction require registration?

No. Registration under Penal Code 290 applies to listed offences, and California operates a tiered system with minimum periods of ten years, twenty years or life depending on the conviction. Some offences in this area carry no registration at all. Which tier applies is determined by what the case resolves to, which is why that question drives the whole defence.

I have been contacted by a detective but not arrested. What should I do?

Decline the interview and call a lawyer. That period is when most of the evidence in these cases is gathered, including recorded calls made with the complainant's cooperation. Declining to be interviewed is not an admission and cannot be used as one. Anything said in that conversation can be.

Can I contact the complainant to clear it up?

No. It is the single most damaging thing available to do. Contact after an allegation supports a charge under Penal Code 136.1 for witness intimidation, it is treated as consciousness of guilt regardless of what was said, and it is recorded. If there is a protective order, contact also violates it independently.

Can these charges be filed with no physical evidence?

Yes, and they frequently are. An account alone can support a charge, and in many of these cases there is no forensic evidence of any kind. That does not make the case weak or strong by itself; it means the defence is built around the account, its history and the surrounding records rather than around physical proof.

Is consent a defence to a charge involving someone under 18?

Not to a charge under Penal Code 261.5, which is based on age alone. The age difference between the parties affects how the offence can be charged and what the exposure is, but it does not make consent a defence. This surprises people regularly, particularly where both parties are young.

Can registration ever be ended?

Under the tiered system, petitions for termination are available once the minimum period for the tier has been completed and the statutory requirements are met. It is not automatic and it is not available to everyone. See record relief for what else is available after a case is over.

What does defending a sex offence case cost?

It depends on the counts, whether registration is in play, whether forensic examination of devices is involved, and whether the case is likely to be tried. Call and I will tell you what representation in your situation would cost before you commit to anything.

Last updated

Real Client Testimonials

Five stars on Google.
Both offices.

Sacramento
The Law Offices of Christopher Parkhurst exceeded my expectations. Attorney Kit Parkhurst was extremely responsive and professional from the very beginning. I contacted his office on behalf of a family member, and he responded within seconds to offer a free consultation. Remarkably, he was able to resolve the case the very same day.
All communication was handled efficiently by phone and email, and we did not even need to appear in court. He later called to confirm that the case was resolved and all charges had been dropped.
Attorney Parkhurst is highly knowledgeable, professional, friendly, compassionate, and honest. His pricing was also very affordable. I highly recommend his services to anyone in need of legal representation.
Katy Nunez6 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Rob Ward and Aaron Weaver did an excellent job helping me with a driving-related case. From the beginning they were very responsive, professional, and made sure I understood every step of the process. Their experience and strategy made a huge difference and they were able to negotiate a significantly better outcome than what I was originally facing. I’m very grateful for their help and would highly recommend them!
Brandon Muela4 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Kit was amazing to work with. He really went above and beyond for our family and stayed on top of everything. He was super responsive, easy to talk to, and just genuinely kind. We felt supported the whole time and are really thankful we had him on our side.
Linzy Moore3 months ago · 10 reviews
Sacramento
I can’t recommend Kit enough. He is a true blessing. Professional, knowledgeable, and genuinely caring. He handled everything with confidence and kept us at ease the entire time. The results exceeded our expectations, and we’re very thankful for his dedication to our family.
Dominique Moore3 months ago · 2 reviews
Sacramento
On Saturday April 3, 2026 I was arrested for a domestic violence charge and given my first court appearance on April 7, 2026

Due to the weekend and Easter I was unable to get help from an attorney. When I called and found Kit on Monday April 6, 2026, he immediately picked up the phone and assured me I was in good hands and could help.

Kit could hear my stress level and told me several times everything would be fine. Kit then explained his plan of action and on April 7, 2026 at 1100 hours Kit called me stating he spoke to the DA and the charges would not be filed.

If it wasn't for Kit's approach, knowledge and claming personality not sure what my outcome would of been.

I hope no ever gets fasley arrested, but if you do, do not hesitate to call Kit and let him work for you.

Lastly I just want thank God for bringing this talented, non-judgemental Attorney into my life when I needed someone to help.
Mike3 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Showing love from Huntington Beach! Thank you Kit and Aaron! These guys got me out of a jam and I highly recommend! I didn’t have to drive hours to resolve! Thank you again Aaron!! Best of luck on all your cases!
nik saba month ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
If you want to work with an experienced attorney that has integrity, is honest, and genuinely cares about his clients look no further than Aaron and his wonderful team.

I couldn’t be more impressed with the outstanding service provided by my attorney. From the very first consultation, they were professional, attentive, and genuinely invested in my case. They took the time to explain every detail clearly, answered all of my questions, and guided me through each step with confidence and expertise.

Their communication was exceptional, offered consistent updates, quick responses, and a reassuring presence throughout the entire process. It was clear they truly cared about achieving the best possible outcome, and their hard work absolutely paid off.

Thanks to their dedication and skill, what could have been a stressful situation was handled smoothly and efficiently. I highly recommend Aaron to anyone seeking knowledgeable, trustworthy, and compassionate legal representation.
Ashley Sinhg8 months ago · 6 reviews · 1 photo
Sacramento
I found myself in a situation where I was facing charges.
The morning after Christmas I had arraignment and was petrified of what was about to happen.
I called several Law offices, Chris picked up and quickly gave me a huge feeling of relief.
He knew what was happening in the back scenes and explained how we should go about figuring it out.
He made one phone call and informed me my case was dropped.
I truly can't thank him enough!
What a great guy, I would recommend him to anyone.
I wanted to post on all channels, it's beyond real and deserved.

Seriously Chris you went out of your way to help me and I appreciate it so much! Ill never forget it.
Dan Bergendahl6 months ago · 15 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
If you’re looking for a lawyer that is hardworking, skilled, family oriented and exceeds all expectations you have come to the right place. Chris Parkhurst showed up for me and my family and kept us updated the whole way. He’s gone above and beyond for me and if you’re hoping to have the best possible outcome for you then I’d recommend them 100%.
Quinn Zidara year ago · 5 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
BEST LAW FIRM EVER!!!!!! I was so blessed they took my case and they were extremely helpful. I was dealt a bad hand and this law firm got my 3 counts dismissed. 1 second im probably going away for a long time and the next everything was dropped. I couldn't have asked for a better law firm and would recommend them to any in need of a fantastic law firm. Thank you for everything you've done for my family and I
Steven Marley5 years ago · 4 reviews
Roseville
Chris is amazing. I was looking at time in jail and this man got me off with probation. I owe him a lot. There isn’t enough I can say what he’s done for me and my family. I think him from the bottom of my heart. If u need a attorney this who I would recommend
Jeff Hill5 years ago · 1 review
Roseville
The law isn’t always on your side. As a veteran that can be frustrating and disheartening. Kit and the team really go to bat for you and I can’t thank them enough. If you find yourself needing legal representation put your trust in their hands to do everything they possibly can to help you cause they will. Thank you
Chico Moralesa year ago · 3 reviews

Read all of our reviews