Call (916) 277-8299 Free case evaluation

Practices  /  Homicide & Manslaughter

Homicide and manslaughter defense in California.

In most of these cases what happened is not in dispute. What it is called is, and that difference decides everything. Licensed since 1999.

What actually separates the degrees.

Homicide is the killing of a human being. Whether it is a crime, and which crime, depends almost entirely on the mental state the prosecution can prove. That is why two cases with identical facts can be charged as murder in one and as involuntary manslaughter in the other, and why the argument in these cases is rarely about what happened.

Murder under Penal Code 187 requires malice. Malice can be express, meaning an intent to kill, or implied, meaning a conscious disregard for human life. Manslaughter under Penal Code 192 is an unlawful killing without malice, which is why provocation, heat of passion and an honest but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defence reduce murder to manslaughter rather than excusing it.

There is also a category the law does not punish at all. Penal Code 197 sets out when a homicide is justifiable, including in defence of yourself or another. A death is not automatically a crime, and treating it as one from the first interview is a mistake that is difficult to correct later.

Homicide charges I defend.

These are the homicide and related charges I defend across California.

Manslaughter offences

  • Voluntary manslaughter (Penal Code 192(a)). A killing on sudden quarrel or heat of passion, or on an honest but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defence.
  • Involuntary manslaughter (Penal Code 192(b)). A killing without malice during an unlawful act or through criminal negligence.
  • Vehicular manslaughter (Penal Code 192(c)). Charged where a death results from driving, with the degree turning on whether the negligence was ordinary or gross.
  • Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated (Penal Code 191.5). The most serious charge arising from a DUI. Amended in 2025.
  • Punishment for manslaughter (Penal Code 193). The section that sets the exposure, and the reason the distinction between the subsections matters so much.

Murder and attempted murder

  • Murder (Penal Code 187). Requires malice, express or implied. Amended in 2023.
  • Malice defined (Penal Code 188). The section that defines what the prosecution actually has to prove, and the one that changed substantially with the reform of the felony murder rule.
  • Degrees of murder (Penal Code 189). Separates first from second degree, including the narrowed felony murder rule.
  • Special circumstances (Penal Code 190.2). The allegations that raise first degree murder to its highest exposure.
  • Attempted murder (Penal Code 664 and 187). Requires a specific intent to kill, which is a higher bar than the act alone establishes.

Charges filed alongside

  • Assault with a deadly weapon (Penal Code 245(a)(1)). Frequently charged in the alternative, and frequently where these cases resolve.
  • Justifiable homicide (Penal Code 197). Not a charge but a complete answer to one, covering defence of self and of others.
  • Witness or victim intimidation (Penal Code 136.1). Often added after charging, commonly from recorded jail calls. Amended in 2025.
  • Accessory after the fact (Penal Code 32). Charged against people who were not present at the death but are alleged to have helped afterwards.

Enhancements and sentencing exposure

In homicide cases the enhancements frequently carry more exposure than the underlying count.

  • Firearm enhancements (Penal Code 12022.53). Applies where a firearm was used in a listed felony, with exposure that can exceed the underlying count.
  • Great bodily injury enhancement (Penal Code 12022.7). Charged where someone other than the deceased was seriously hurt.
  • Gang enhancement (Penal Code 186.22). Requires proof about an organisation, not only about you. Tightened in 2021.
  • Punishment for murder (Penal Code 190). Sets the terms, and the reason the degree charged is the central question in the case.

If a family member is being questioned and has not been arrested, that is still the right time to call. What is said in the first interviews shapes what gets charged, and there is no way to take it back afterwards.

What a homicide conviction can cost.

Homicide carries the most serious exposure in California law, and it varies enormously with the count charged.

  • Custody. From a determinate term for involuntary manslaughter through to life without parole where a special circumstance is found. The distance between the counts is the case.
  • Strike consequences. Every offence in this category is a strike, which affects credits, parole eligibility and any future case permanently.
  • Firearm enhancements. Where a firearm is alleged, the enhancement can add more time than the underlying offence carries.
  • Immigration. A homicide conviction is an aggravated felony for immigration purposes, with consequences that do not depend on the sentence.
  • Civil exposure. A parallel wrongful death claim frequently follows, with its own timeline and its own risks around anything said.
  • Your family. These cases run for years rather than months, and the practical burden on the people around you is part of what is being decided.

Which of these is actually in play depends on the count and the allegations attached to it. That is the first thing worth establishing, and it is often not what the initial reporting says.

Why these cases turn on state of mind.

The charge filed is the top of a range

Homicide cases are commonly filed as murder and resolved as something else, because the filing decision is made early, on a partial record, from a police report. What the evidence supports once it has been examined is a separate question, and the gap between the two is where the work is.

State of mind is proved by inference

Nobody testifies directly to what someone intended. Malice, premeditation and provocation are all argued from circumstances: the sequence of events, the physical evidence, what was said before and afterwards. Inferences can be contested in a way that facts cannot.

Self-defence is decided on what was reasonable at the time

California law does not require retreat, and it judges the belief in the need for force from the position of the person who had to make the decision quickly and without full information. Reconstructing that accurately, rather than with hindsight, is a large part of the defence.

What experience with these cases actually changes

It is knowing which experts matter and when to retain them, how to preserve scene evidence before it is gone, and how the distinctions between the counts are actually argued rather than how they read in the code. I have been doing this since 1999.

There is no version of a homicide case that is sensible to face without a lawyer. That is not a sales point, it is the one area where the answer is not conditional. What is worth discussing is what representation involves, how long it takes, and what it costs. Call me and I will tell you all three honestly.

How I defend homicide cases.

  • Immediate intervention — stopping the interviews, and dealing with investigators directly rather than through the person they are trying to build the case against.
  • Independent investigation — the scene, the witnesses, the physical evidence, and the accounts given before anyone had time to settle on a version.
  • Testing the case — whether malice is supported, whether the degree charged is sustainable, whether provocation or self-defence applies, and whether each enhancement has evidence behind it.
  • Experts — pathology, reconstruction and toxicology where the physical evidence is genuinely contestable rather than merely unwelcome.
  • The preliminary hearing — the first point at which the prosecution has to show its case rather than describe it.
  • Personal attention — you work with us directly.

I have been licensed to practise in California since 1999, State Bar number 203402, and I defend these cases across nine Northern California counties from offices in Sacramento and Roseville. If someone is being questioned now, that is the call to make before any other.

Where I handle homicide cases.

I appear in the criminal courts of all nine counties below. The court that hears the case is set by where the death occurred, not by where anyone lives.

Sacramento County Placer County Yolo County El Dorado County San Joaquin County Butte County Yuba County Solano County Sutter County

Where a city has enough demand for this charge to warrant its own page, I have written one:

Sacramento

Homicide questions I hear most.

What is the difference between murder and manslaughter?

Malice. Murder under Penal Code 187 requires it, either as an intent to kill or as a conscious disregard for human life. Manslaughter under Penal Code 192 is an unlawful killing without malice. Provocation, heat of passion and an honest but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defence reduce murder to manslaughter, which is why the same facts can support either charge depending on what can be proved about state of mind.

Can a death be charged as a crime if it was an accident?

It depends on how the accident happened. Involuntary manslaughter covers deaths caused by criminal negligence or during an unlawful act, so an accident is not automatically outside the criminal law. Ordinary negligence is generally not enough. Where driving is involved the analysis runs through Penal Code 192(c) and, if alcohol or drugs are alleged, DUI defence.

What happens if I was defending myself or someone else?

Penal Code 197 sets out when a homicide is justifiable, and it is a complete answer rather than a mitigating factor. California does not require you to retreat first, and the reasonableness of the belief is judged from the position of the person who had to decide quickly. Establishing that means securing the scene evidence and the independent witnesses early.

Why has the district attorney charged murder when nobody intended anyone to die?

Because malice can be implied rather than express, and because charges are filed at the top of what the report will support. Implied malice requires a conscious disregard for human life, which is argued from circumstances rather than proved directly. Whether it is actually supported is tested afterwards, which is why the filed charge and the eventual resolution are frequently different.

Is a homicide charge a strike?

Yes. Every offence in this category appears on the serious or violent felony lists, so a conviction is counted permanently and affects credits, parole eligibility and the exposure on any future case. See violent crimes for how the strike system works.

Should a family member talk to detectives to clear things up?

Not before speaking to a lawyer. These cases are built substantially from what people say in the first days while trying to be helpful, and statements given without advice are used as readily as any other evidence. Declining to be interviewed until you have advice is not an admission of anything.

What does defending a homicide case cost?

It depends on the count, the allegations, whether experts are required and whether the case is likely to be tried. These cases run for a year or more. Call and I will tell you what representation would involve and what it would cost before you commit to anything.

Last updated

Real Client Testimonials

Five stars on Google.
Both offices.

Sacramento
The Law Offices of Christopher Parkhurst exceeded my expectations. Attorney Kit Parkhurst was extremely responsive and professional from the very beginning. I contacted his office on behalf of a family member, and he responded within seconds to offer a free consultation. Remarkably, he was able to resolve the case the very same day.
All communication was handled efficiently by phone and email, and we did not even need to appear in court. He later called to confirm that the case was resolved and all charges had been dropped.
Attorney Parkhurst is highly knowledgeable, professional, friendly, compassionate, and honest. His pricing was also very affordable. I highly recommend his services to anyone in need of legal representation.
Katy Nunez6 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Rob Ward and Aaron Weaver did an excellent job helping me with a driving-related case. From the beginning they were very responsive, professional, and made sure I understood every step of the process. Their experience and strategy made a huge difference and they were able to negotiate a significantly better outcome than what I was originally facing. I’m very grateful for their help and would highly recommend them!
Brandon Muela4 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Kit was amazing to work with. He really went above and beyond for our family and stayed on top of everything. He was super responsive, easy to talk to, and just genuinely kind. We felt supported the whole time and are really thankful we had him on our side.
Linzy Moore3 months ago · 10 reviews
Sacramento
I can’t recommend Kit enough. He is a true blessing. Professional, knowledgeable, and genuinely caring. He handled everything with confidence and kept us at ease the entire time. The results exceeded our expectations, and we’re very thankful for his dedication to our family.
Dominique Moore3 months ago · 2 reviews
Sacramento
On Saturday April 3, 2026 I was arrested for a domestic violence charge and given my first court appearance on April 7, 2026

Due to the weekend and Easter I was unable to get help from an attorney. When I called and found Kit on Monday April 6, 2026, he immediately picked up the phone and assured me I was in good hands and could help.

Kit could hear my stress level and told me several times everything would be fine. Kit then explained his plan of action and on April 7, 2026 at 1100 hours Kit called me stating he spoke to the DA and the charges would not be filed.

If it wasn't for Kit's approach, knowledge and claming personality not sure what my outcome would of been.

I hope no ever gets fasley arrested, but if you do, do not hesitate to call Kit and let him work for you.

Lastly I just want thank God for bringing this talented, non-judgemental Attorney into my life when I needed someone to help.
Mike3 months ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
Showing love from Huntington Beach! Thank you Kit and Aaron! These guys got me out of a jam and I highly recommend! I didn’t have to drive hours to resolve! Thank you again Aaron!! Best of luck on all your cases!
nik saba month ago · 3 reviews
Sacramento
If you want to work with an experienced attorney that has integrity, is honest, and genuinely cares about his clients look no further than Aaron and his wonderful team.

I couldn’t be more impressed with the outstanding service provided by my attorney. From the very first consultation, they were professional, attentive, and genuinely invested in my case. They took the time to explain every detail clearly, answered all of my questions, and guided me through each step with confidence and expertise.

Their communication was exceptional, offered consistent updates, quick responses, and a reassuring presence throughout the entire process. It was clear they truly cared about achieving the best possible outcome, and their hard work absolutely paid off.

Thanks to their dedication and skill, what could have been a stressful situation was handled smoothly and efficiently. I highly recommend Aaron to anyone seeking knowledgeable, trustworthy, and compassionate legal representation.
Ashley Sinhg8 months ago · 6 reviews · 1 photo
Sacramento
I found myself in a situation where I was facing charges.
The morning after Christmas I had arraignment and was petrified of what was about to happen.
I called several Law offices, Chris picked up and quickly gave me a huge feeling of relief.
He knew what was happening in the back scenes and explained how we should go about figuring it out.
He made one phone call and informed me my case was dropped.
I truly can't thank him enough!
What a great guy, I would recommend him to anyone.
I wanted to post on all channels, it's beyond real and deserved.

Seriously Chris you went out of your way to help me and I appreciate it so much! Ill never forget it.
Dan Bergendahl6 months ago · 15 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
If you’re looking for a lawyer that is hardworking, skilled, family oriented and exceeds all expectations you have come to the right place. Chris Parkhurst showed up for me and my family and kept us updated the whole way. He’s gone above and beyond for me and if you’re hoping to have the best possible outcome for you then I’d recommend them 100%.
Quinn Zidara year ago · 5 reviews · 1 photo
Roseville
BEST LAW FIRM EVER!!!!!! I was so blessed they took my case and they were extremely helpful. I was dealt a bad hand and this law firm got my 3 counts dismissed. 1 second im probably going away for a long time and the next everything was dropped. I couldn't have asked for a better law firm and would recommend them to any in need of a fantastic law firm. Thank you for everything you've done for my family and I
Steven Marley5 years ago · 4 reviews
Roseville
Chris is amazing. I was looking at time in jail and this man got me off with probation. I owe him a lot. There isn’t enough I can say what he’s done for me and my family. I think him from the bottom of my heart. If u need a attorney this who I would recommend
Jeff Hill5 years ago · 1 review
Roseville
The law isn’t always on your side. As a veteran that can be frustrating and disheartening. Kit and the team really go to bat for you and I can’t thank them enough. If you find yourself needing legal representation put your trust in their hands to do everything they possibly can to help you cause they will. Thank you
Chico Moralesa year ago · 3 reviews

Read all of our reviews